![]() I sometime use the camera in 8K RAW as remote camera for pictures and I need more that 1/2000….R5 is 1/4000 Why is like this I have no idea,? Switching from Photo to Video is slow but not as terrible as I thought, disabling in both Photo and Video the sensor cleaning make it somewhat usable Media playback has waveform and vector scope, R5 has nothingĢTB delikin cards are fast enough for 8K RAW LT 60 fps R5 does not have this mode.ĪF at the maximum speed settings is on pair with the R5 it seems but I need more test to confirm With long lens with IS I really don’t miss IBIS, I see no difference vs R5 (70-200 and 100-500), non IS lens is a no go compared to the R5 logically.įace Only AF is really good for filming person as it will not focus on the bg and back to the face if it looses the face. More DR, is it 1.5 stop more than R5 as Gerald claims I cannot judge but is definitely better than the R5 You can really decide what you want to record on the second card in parallel, the R5 is ok but fairly restricted You can decide what you show where for almost anything LCD vs VF vs HDMI Waveform! False Color and Magnifying all during recording.Īll the right info on the recoding display, the R5 is a bit of mess while recording video. The Cinema menu system is much more logical and better organized. XAVC is a way better format to edit than h265 so the fact that you can do 4k up to 120 fps 10bit Clog3 in XAVC is great I was expecting worseĤk 60 is great and better than R5 4k 60 logicallyĤk 120 it seems also a tad better than the R5 but I need more test here to confirm ![]() Btw in Resolve on my gaming notebook I can playback on a 4k 60 timeline with no issue with some basic color grading. So I got a R5c for a week to test to decide if to switch one of my R5 to a R5c.Īfter the first two days these are my observations in comparison to the R5, that are hard to get from the youtube reviewer madness.ĨK 60 RAW is the same quality as 8K 30. I've experimented enough with NR / sharpening / adding grain (and seen what other people do with film-emulation etc) to know that it's not easy and that I'm really not good at it! I really think that NR is an art that no-one seems to talk about online. Of course, the R5C RAW gives you the full ability to do that in post however you would like. Resolve has a nice ability to do NR on the chroma and luma independently, which can yield nice results if you reduce the chroma and leave the luma relatively in-tact. ![]() I'm not sure that compression alone could turn the R5C RAW noise into the GH6 noise though. To be fair, the GH6 noise is compressed (I'm assuming it's the Prores, but could be h26x) and the R5C RAW isn't, so the noise is likely to be sharper (for want of a better word). R5C 10bit looks like there is heavy temporal NR going on which causes that unnatural shimmering, especially when you compare it to the RAW output which is noisy but doesn't shimmer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |